hisku_on_a_cinema-camera_projector_a_woman_listens_to_her_inn_ded71976-7a41-4c5b-a9c1-dcbf0c710d4d_2

The Spirit Speaks When the Heart Listens

There was a time in my life when anxiety was a constant companion. For years, I struggled with severe depression that left me hollow, lost, and trapped in a fog of uncertainty. My confidence had crumbled, and the simplest decisions felt like insurmountable mountains. Life became a colorless grind of tight-chested despair and anxious nights, marked by an ever-present knot in my stomach. It was as though I was suspended in darkness – what some call the “dark night of the soul.”

Yet, at the darkest point in my entire life, a faint light began to flicker. It didn’t feel like a dramatic epiphany or a life-altering event. Instead, it was a subtle, persistent whisper from within – a voice that offered both guidance and solace. At first, I didn’t understand what it was. This inner voice, as I came to call it, gently pointed out behavioral patterns I had never noticed. It brought to my attention how my own negative, defeatist self-talk had programmed my life to revolve around repetitive, aimless patterns that brought me nothing but heartache and pain.

Unbeknownst to me at the time, I had opened a door to a legendary inner source – the voice of the heart. This source is known by many names, depending on whom you ask. It has been called “The Holy Spirit,” “the messenger of God,” “the voice of the Spirit,” and “the muse,” among others. Naming it, in my opinion, is not important; what matters is its function in our lives.

It took me years to understand that function. Initially, I treated the voice with a healthy dose of skepticism and downright suspicion. I didn’t understand its source, and that uncertainty fueled my imagination. I thought it could be a demonic voice or, worse, the voice of madness. These projections were undoubtedly shaped by residual religious beliefs and accepted societal norms. They did not reflect the true nature of the voice or the quality of the advice it gave me. Nevertheless, my relationship with it was ambivalent, to say the least. I fought and distrusted it, not because its advice was unsound but because it revealed things about myself I didn’t want to see. It pointed out flaws in my logic and behavior that I was not ready to accept.

Despite my resistance, the truths in the voice’s insights were undeniable. The real litmus test for me, however, was its application in practical life scenarios. The opportunity presented itself while I was working as a senior scientist at the University of Helsinki.

I was trying to identify and clone an unknown gene that seemed to have a crucial function in a type of brain cells called astrocytes. At the time, nothing was known about this gene; it had neither been sequenced nor characterized. For six months, I tried every protocol and method available, yet came up empty-handed every time. Frustrated and nearing the end of my options, I turned to my inner voice – not because I had faith that it would solve the problem. To be honest, I felt that it was one thing to ask for spiritual or psychological guidance but a completely different thing to tackle scientific challenges, but I had nothing to lose.

The guidance I received was astonishingly simple: switch from adult tissues to embryonic tissues as the source of the gene pool. At the time, I didn’t know that this gene was more active during embryonic development. It was a blind leap of faith, but within two weeks of making the switch, I successfully cloned and sequenced the gene. My inner voice had not only guided me toward a practical solution but had also illuminated a deeper truth: the gene’s heightened activity in embryonic tissues pointed to its role in early development—something I hadn’t considered. And this is the true story of how I discovered and cloned the Astroprincin gene and protein.

This discovery was a turning point. The voice I once dismissed as unreliable proved to be more accurate than my rational mind. Slowly, I began seeking its guidance whenever I felt stuck. But the guidance wasn’t always easy to hear, as it ultimately placed the responsibility for whatever happened in my life at my own doorstep. It consistently reminded me that I was the creator of my reality – not its victim. For years, I resisted this idea, clinging to the belief that life’s hardships were the fault of others or circumstances beyond my control. Yet, as I listened, I began to see how much power lay in reclaiming responsibility for my life. This shift in perspective was both liberating and challenging, forcing me to confront truths I had been raised never to consider.

Last year, I published a book that I consider a collaborative effort between this inner voice and myself. It was written with two distinct voices. In the first part, I narrate my life’s story as it was shaped by my perceptions and struggles. In the second part, I gave space to my inner voice to offer its higher perspective on the events of my life. The book reveals how much of my past suffering stemmed from identifying with a false sense of self – a self shaped by societal conditioning and personal misunderstandings about the purpose of life.

The book, which is considered “channeled,” is a testimony to the power of the inner voice and its ability to produce tangible, intelligible results in the physical world. Of course, my book is not a unique phenomenon. Many influential works have been created through what their authors described as channeled or intuitive guidance. Jane Roberts’ Seth material, Esther Hicks’ Abraham teachings, and Neale Donald Walsch’s Conversations with God are just a few examples of this phenomenon. These works resonate with people because they tap into something universal—a source of wisdom that exists within all of us.

Reflecting on what we can achieve by accessing our inner voices, I started to wonder why this is not a common practice among us. I believe it’s because society conditions us to dismiss it. We’re born with an innate connection to this inner wisdom, but we’re taught to ignore it in favor of external validation and rationality. It’s as if we’re all born with perfect vision in a society that insists we’re blind.

The good news is that this connection is never truly lost. It simply requires intentionality to rekindle.

Today, I see my inner voice as my most valuable asset – a source of guidance that complements, rather than replaces, rational thought. It’s helped me overcome depression, navigate challenges, and achieve breakthroughs I never thought possible. This resource can inspire poetry, tell stories, solve daily problems, direct us when we feel lost, heal relationships, and even lead to scientific discoveries.

This is why I feel compelled to share what I’ve learned. Imagine what could happen if more people – and more organizations – tapped into this extraordinary resource. What breakthroughs might we achieve? What relationships might we heal?

I’m now working to create workshops and talks to help individuals and teams access their inner voices. Whether you’re an artist seeking inspiration, a leader facing tough decisions, or simply someone feeling stuck, this resource can transform your life.

If this resonates with you – whether as an individual or on behalf of an organization – I invite you to reach out. Together, we can explore how to access this wellspring of wisdom and apply it in ways that are practical, empowering, and life-changing.

Let’s uncover the potential within.

Check out my book here, and my Goal Setting and Achievement course here.

fbe0295c-acad-49bc-96c2-8e04ba5b03f2_0_1

Mindset Matters: How Your Beliefs Shape Your World

The scientific method relies on observation, measurement, and analysis to formulate conclusions. Each addition to the scientific body of knowledge builds upon what was previously understood. This progressive accumulation of information is what fuels the growth and expansion of our understanding. Likewise, the workings of consciousness follow a similar pattern.

From the moment of birth, our consciousness begins to accumulate information. The data we gather is contingent on the existing information within our environment. Each individual amasses a distinct set of information, molding their unique worldview, and subsequently, impacting their life experiences. Thus, it is reasonable to assert that our lives are fundamentally shaped by information.

This statement is not particularly new. We are already well aware that our bodies are subject to the influence of information encoded within our DNA. In recent years, through the field of Epigenetics, we have also discovered that various factors, including our environment, emotions, and even our experiences, can exert an influence through which DNA is activated or suppressed. Clearly, there exists a dynamic interplay between physical and non-physical information sets. One of these sets lies beyond our control; we cannot alter the genes we inherit. Conversely, we wield significant influence over the information we gather. If this collection of information can indeed determine which genes are expressed and which remain dormant, it underscores the importance of our awareness and conscious choices in the information we accumulate.

In my experience, accomplishing this is often easier said than done, but it’s far from impossible. The information we’ve accumulated over the years has created certain patterns that govern every facet of our lives. Our habits, routines, triggers, responses, reactions, disposition, and moods are all embedded within neural circuits that often activate with minimal conscious input from us. These circuits guide our focus and attention, determining which information we notice and which we overlook. They have a tendency to seek out data that reinforces the assumptions upon which they’re built, while disregarding any contradictory information, especially that which challenges our fundamental beliefs.

To grasp the influence of our focus on perception, we need not look beyond the renowned “Gorilla Experiment.” In this study, an individual dressed as a gorilla enters a room where people are engaged in passing a ball to one another. Participants, who were instructed to count the ball passes, entirely overlooked the gorilla’s presence. Their intense concentration on the ball obscured the blatantly obvious and wholly unexpected appearance of the person donned in the gorilla suit. This omission happened despite these instructions were provided mere minutes earlier. Now, contemplate the strength of your focus and its influence on your perception when it is directed by instructions ingrained since childhood. How likely do you think it is for us to notice something new, particularly if it contradicts the beliefs we’ve cultivated over a lifetime?

We often hold the conviction that what we witness is factual and indisputable because, in our minds, only observable events are deemed real, as the saying goes, “I’ll believe it when I see it.” For those participants who failed to notice the gorilla, its presence in the room remains a made-up story. However, this experiment barely scratches the surface of how our perception, and subsequently our entire worldview, hinges on the focal point of our attention. To my knowledge, we have yet to delve deeper into scrutinizing the impact of our beliefs on our perception. Given the substantial diversity in our belief systems, we should anticipate a similar range of variations in our perceptions.

Despite the absence of scientific inquiry into this matter, which, as I mentioned in my previous post, would hold significant implications for scientific reasoning, there exists a wealth of anecdotal evidence. We understand that eyewitness testimonies of an accident, for instance, are often unreliable as they seldom align with one another. We typically attribute this phenomenon to the fallibility of human memory, as it’s challenging for us to entertain the notion that these individuals may have genuinely perceived the situation differently. Similarly, albeit in less dramatic circumstances, couples rarely agree on their recollection of past events. This is chiefly because each person views the world from their distinct vantage point, shaped by the information they have amassed throughout their lives.

Additionally, an entire industry revolves around the deliberate alteration of the information we’ve accumulated throughout our lives: the self-help and personal development sector. While these endeavors do not unfold within the confines of rigorous scientific settings and remain inherently individual and subjective, there exists a sufficient body of evidence to sway skeptics. The widespread consensus on the pivotal role of mindset in achieving success should serve as ample indication for anyone willing to explore the subject. Nevertheless, those who remain unconvinced of the validity of such assertions are unlikely to perceive the evidence supporting them.

This article is intended for individuals who are open-minded enough to acknowledge that widespread acceptance does not necessarily equate to truth. When a multitude of people have achieved success by altering their mindsets, it should prompt us to question why it’s challenging to believe that reshaping our ideas is essential if we aspire to perceive a different world. We can take a moment to reflect and question our ideas, whether they pertain to personal or global aspects that we would like to change. All of us possess blind spots that selectively filter out particular information. The key question is: What are we currently filtering out that, if focused upon, could reshape our perception? Devoting some time to pondering this question may serve as the foundation for significant transformation. Moreover, I hope that posing this question acts as a catalyst for discussions that can help us, collectively, expand our perception.

To read more about the role of information in our lives, get your copy of Quantum Being today!

9ef04db6-ebe8-40f2-8d96-68e5c05c32060_1

From particle to wave: the secret that connects our daily lives to our quantum reality

Albert Einstein dropped a bombshell on the world when he discovered that mass and energy are actually the same thing! Every mass can be converted into an immense amount of energy. This knowledge is more than a century old and is an established scientific fact. Today, it is common to split atoms and harness the energy generated to power our modern cities.

Despite this established fact, we tend to consider ourselves as mere mass, often forgetting that we are also made up of energy. The amount of energy locked within an average human being weighing 70 kg is mind-blowing. If that mass were to be converted into energy, it would equal hundreds of thousands of times the energy released by the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Simply mind-blowing.

Interestingly, we disregard our energetic reality because we tend to believe that what happens at the atomic level has nothing to do with what happens at our level. It is convenient for us to believe that there is a breakdown of physical laws between the micro and macro environments, and that whatever applies to atoms and subatomic particles does not apply to us. Accepting that it could apply to us would require a paradigm shift that seems too challenging for most of us to contemplate.

In line with this convenient attitude, which somehow implies that we live in a universe different from the one in which the atoms composing our bodies exist, we believe that the quantum reality experienced by subatomic particles does not apply to us. It is a known fact that electrons and other particles have a dual nature—they are both particles and waves simultaneously. However, humans and other macro-organisms are typically considered only as masses without any dual nature in terms of energy or wave functionality.

Personally, I don’t believe that the laws of the universe that apply to the components of my body don’t apply to me, but I understand the reasons behind this convenient attitude. Firstly, scientists have not been able to record any observations that confirm our quantum nature. Secondly, accepting that we could have a quantum nature would undermine the principle upon which our scientific knowledge rests: namely, that our universe is material in nature.

Let’s begin with observations. When an electron travels as a wave and encounters a screen with two holes, it is known to pass through both holes simultaneously. However, when the same electron travels as a particle, it will go through only one of the holes. As a wave, the electron is not restricted to a single option; it inherently possesses the ability to explore all available options simultaneously. On the other hand, as a particle, it lacks that freedom.

Humans, when encountering a fork in the road, have never been observed to travel both routes simultaneously. This led scientists to believe that humans do not have a quantum nature. However, I see this differently. With our body mass and weight, we have acted exactly as expected from particles, limited in choice. But why would that exclude the possibility that another aspect of ourselves has the ability to explore both options simultaneously, just as an electron wave does?

The reason scientists have rejected this possibility is due to its implications. Accepting such a notion would suggest that there is an underlying depth to our existence, extending beyond what initially meets the eye and transcending the confines of our physical bodies alone. This would raise questions about the certainty that the universe is solely the material world we perceive. Questions such as “If I have always taken all options presented to me, where are these versions of myself that have accepted what I have rejected or rejected what I have accepted?” would emerge.

Such a question raises doubts about the principle of materiality upon which our scientific knowledge is based. It also brings into focus the role of consciousness in life. Currently, scientists consider consciousness as a byproduct of biological life, implying that it arises from material existence.

I believe that maintaining an open mind, capable of considering all possibilities and following the evidence, will enable us to answer such challenging questions. We already know that when we measure an electron wave, it collapses into an electron particle. Scientists posit that the act of measurement causes the collapse of all other potentialities the wave could have had, leaving only one particle to be observed. However, in my book “Quantum Being,” I propose a different interpretation for the same observation.

I argue that the information known about the electron is what causes its collapse into a particle. Information, in my opinion, leads to projected materialization. As humans, we possess a wealth of information that distinguishes each one of us. This abundance of materialized information makes it almost impossible for us to be aware of our quantum nature. However, we can adopt the mindset of Quantum Beings by understanding the role of information in our lives. This understanding can provide us with advantages in manifesting the life we desire to experience.

In my upcoming series of articles, I will explore how information is materialized in our world and offer strategies for effectively dealing with it. If you are interested in delving deeper into your quantum nature, I invite you to read my book ‘Quantum Being.’ In the book, I have outlined several strategies that you can use to live a happier, more empowered life based on your understanding of your quantum nature.